Heracleitus Socrates Plato Aristotle St. Augustine Niccolo Machiavelli Baruch Spinoza Thomas Hobbes John Locke Jean-Jacques Rousseau Adam Smith Immanuel Kant G.W.F. Hegel Thomas Jefferson Alexis de Tocqueville Karl Marx Friedrich Nietzsche John Dewey Hannah Arendt Max Horkheimer Michel Foucault John Rawls Ronald Dworkin Noam Chomsky


One of the courses about the history of modern philosophy:


ico-kursevi 41: Immanuel Kant

The aim of the course is that students become familiar with Kant’s life (1724-1804) and his basic philosophical suppositions. In which historical circumstances does Kant’s philosophy occur? Why is Kant’s system of transcendental idealism one of the most comprehensive philosophical systems in the history of philosophy?
Explain Kant’s three key philosophical questions:

  • What can I know?
  • What should I do?
  • What can I hope fo?

Kant tended to overcome the restrictions of empiricism and rationalism. Our knowledge of outside world does not start with sensual experience like John Lock claimed, but Kant considered that sensual experience was conditioned by our powers of knowledge (sensuality, sense and mind). Kant was looking for that apriori (general and necessary). That is Copernicus’ turn in Kant’s philosophy: subject is no longer passive in receiving impressions from the outside world, but his powers of knowledge condition the subject of perception. Point out to students how a man understands the perspectives of our consciousness. Why are space and time sensual apriori forms for Kant? What is the Schopenhauer’s attitude towards that question? What is the Kant’s “transcendental idealism” or “empirical reality”? Under intellect, Kant takes the power of comprehension, judgment and deduction. In that sense, Kant establishes the distinction among four kinds of judgments: apriori, aposteriori, analytic and synthetic (explain the difference). Why are sensuality and reason constitutive elements of our experience? Why does mind (ideas of god, freedom and immortality of soul) have only regulatory function? What is the essential difference between reason and mind for Kant? Is metaphysics, as a science, possible for Kant? Explain the concept of transcendence (the thing by itself – ding an sich). According to Kant, we can perceive only noumenon (appearance) of some thing (the thing for itself – ding fur sich), but not the thing by itself. With Kant’s restrictions of knowledge one gets more possibilities to believe, which is the basis for metaphysics. What is the Kant’s apriori principle in “The Critique of Pure Reason”? What is beauty for Kant? What is the relation between beautiful and sublime? How does Kant’s philosophical system relate to other philosophical systems of German idealism?

book Literature:

  • Immanuel Kant “The Critique of Pure Reason”“The Critique of Practical Reason”“The Critique of
    “Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics”,“Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”;
  • V. Korac, B. Pavlovic “The History of Philosophy”, Philosophy textbook for the 4th grade of grammar and vocational schools;
  • Cekic, Savic, Cvetkovic “Philosophy”, Philosophy textbook for the 4th grade of grammar and vocational schools;
  • Ivan Kolaric “Philosophy”, Philosophy textbook for the 4th grade of grammar and vocational schools;
  • Bertrand Russell “The History of Western Civilisation”;
  • G.W.H. Hegel “The History of Philosophy”.
  • Beiser, Frederick “The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.